Taylor chronicles this in his book. Over time, certainly hundreds of young men, of whom many have been railroaded. Your implication is a curious one. I can think of isolated cases of injustice that have merited a lot of thought and attention. Were you troubled, for instance, by the IRS's targeting of a few conservative groups? I certainly was. In the overall scheme, does it compare to some other injustices perpetrated by the federal government? No. Does it merit investigation and condemnation? Of course. Do dozens or perhaps hundreds of cases of false prosecutions or expulsions merit investigation and condemnation? Of course. I would think any rational, decent adult would think so. That I'm having to explain this particular point to a lawyer is especially discouraging. I don't expect a not-so-terribly-bright academic in the less rigorous regions of the academy to understand that just because actual sexual assaults of college students numerically exceed the number of unjustified expulsions/prosecutions does not mean that those unjustified expulsions are overblown and insignificant. I do expect an attorney to be more sensitive to such injustices than most, regardless if it meets the as-yet undefined threshold number at which point we apparently should treat it as significant.
I have a son, not a daughter. The chances that a daughter is going to be sexually assaulted in college is quite low. That said, I think I'd be derelict in my duties in not having discussions about behaviors in college that would put her in greater danger. The same applies with regards to sons and false accusations of sexual assault on campus. The chances of this happening are also quite low, but I'd be derelict in my duties if I didn't discuss with him the fact that in a mutually intoxicated situation, the male is held responsible for his actions and the female is not and that there is a presumption of guilt on the part of the male in the current system. This is precisely the advice given by Taylor to his college-aged son.