Sure, quantity of accusations can sometimes be indicative of guilt, but that's dependent on some other factors. For instance, with Cos, there are a whole lot of women telling eerily similar stories about how precisely the Cos carried out the rapes. That adds to the plausibility of their claims. On the flip side, let's again talk about Bill. We have a whole string of women who've talked about consensual relationships with him, yet we have two or three who claimed he raped them. Is that what we usually see with serial rapists? A string of totally consensual relationships in which none of the women allege he abused them, and then several women the perp brutalizes and rapes? Doesn't strike me as terribly credible.