white existence. I asked this before. Which is worse: occasionally making racially insensitive statements yet working, worshiping, living an integrated existence or never making any racially insensitive statements but choosing to live a racially-exclusive life and then calling Group A "racists?" What's worse? Forget about Madison, I can point to liberal enclaves much larger than Madison where this is the norm. Steaming, raging hypocrites who mistakenly assume they have the moral high ground because they say all the right things and assume the "correct" political positions.
I have a great-uncle (and a grandfather) who helped start Heifer International. That great-uncle is very conservative and if you listened to him explain his politics, many/most of these virtue signalers would label him a "racist." Yet beyond Heifer, he and his wife have devoted much of their lives going into prisons, serving predominantly minority group prisoners and if you were a "person of color" at a family function as a guest, you would be treated no differently than anyone else. I would humbly submit that he is less racially biased and much more representative of a Christian vision of racial reconciliation than any of the virtue signalers who attend silly affairs like this one in Washington. It's what you do and not what you say. It's also, actually, one of the markers in the decline of culture, where words and silliness like these marches are valued and recognized more than actions that actually help people in disadvantaged groups.