The links you give me are from 2020. If you would BOTHER to read Dr. Risch's entire paper, he already said the French study with 42 participants is not a valid study. And the other link you posted stated, "This far into the pandemic, with double-blind, randomized, controlled clinical trials starting to be published and showing, each and every one of them so far, that hydroxychloroquine shows no benefit ...:"
Dr. Risch already explained these were done either on hospitalized patients (when it's too late to be effective) or on study participants too young to realize any meaningful statistical conclusions.
Do you know how many RCTs were performed on vulnerable populations within 5 days of symptom onset? ZERO. Yet, tons of observational data abound from many different trials that show it to be completely effective. Now ask yourself, why is it 'accepted" that HCQ+ doesn't work, based on totally flawed logic and non-parallel studies? It's because the Great Fauchino doesn't accept observational data on this...even though he's willing to accept it, flawed as it truly is, on mask-wearing. And in case you're wondering why RCTs weren't conducted on vulnerable patients within 5 days of symptom onset, two reasons: 1) The doctors who found that it works didn't want to do that because they were convinced needless deaths would occur; 2) The medical establishment halted all trials because of the false reports that HCQ caused heart issues.
I'll offer his complete paper yet again, and to anyone else who wants to read it.