I have laid out examples of common, silly behavior exhibited by the marchers. You have first, attributed an argument I never made to me (that they behaved criminally) and now you've labeled my argument "asinine" without responding to the examples I gave and why I think it was silly, ineffective behavior. Now, an intelligent person who takes his brain seriously would explain why their behavior was considered and effective and thus why I'm incorrect. I doubt you will do that, in large part, because there isn't much evidence to suggest that their get-together was much more than a group temper tantrum. Prove me wrong.
Or stick to your usual fare.