Assuming you understand how Wikipedia works, maybe I shouldn't assume that, but regardless... Is it not a little unsettling that I read a different version of the "article" than the one you read and posted yesterday?
I found Dr. Malone interesting, but I don't have any particular desire for him to be right. In fact, as I posted above I really hope he's wrong. But his points are worthy of consideration in a storm of bad data and institutionalized hive mentality censorship and suppression of contrarian thought. He doesn't appear to have selfish or self-serving reasons for speaking out other than what he states: "it's about my children and grandchildren".
He comes off to me as credible, passionate and noble in intention. Yet, I still hope he's wrong as it seems he does as well.
What's most striking to me is that you have half a dozen posts criticizing the man before even listening to him speak. Not a recipe for open mindedness or truth seeking.