You said, "It is not appropriate for a POTUS to tie bombs sent to the opposition, workable or not (whether they exploded or not) to his parties chances of electoral success. I have no doubt that you disagree."
I had said, "[Does it make it] OK? No, not really. Slightly better? Yes." By that, I meant that it was not really OK just because no one was hurt, but it made it slightly better. From that, you were supposed to understand that I agree (so, you were supposed to actually have some doubt that I disagree).
It usually takes us (you and I) 18 back-and-forth posts to figure out that we actually have some common ground. Maybe we can do better this time.
You said, "But like you were in speculating about the motives and affiliation of the sender, you are incorrect." Not sure what that sentence means due to the grammar, but I think it means that my doubts about the motives of the guy were incorrect. In response, I will say that I never made a firm statement in that regard, although I certainly expressed my doubts that someone could be stupid enough to think that doing this would advance Trump's cause, so why would any Trump supporter do it??? But, I do find myself constantly being surprised at how stupid the other end of the bell curve can be. It is hard to fathom that such people can still chew and swallow food, but apparently they do exist. We should not be signing them up to vote, but we do.
Edit to add this: I just saw that guy's van. Can that really be real? Really? Too incredible to believe.