........where (hypothetically of course), you were to argue that "despite their own personal gain in fame and subsequent business, what is the chance that those lawyers of hers truly do anything pro bono?" If you were to further suggest that she may well have bills that we don't know about after the fact, and that that she is a delicate phd flower with a bad memory who makes an easy mark.
If, again hypothetically of course, you were to make allegations such these, I would point out that at this point, they would appear to be withut basis would be without basis, and I would strongly disagree with you and make clear that such hypothetical statements are yours alone, and that i do not agree with them.
This message has been edited 3 time(s).