I am not a fan of what about arguments soo I’m not impressed.
I’m simply pointing the convenience of your argument about now being against impeachment of BC when it doesn’t count and just a leetle coincidentally supports your argument in favor of a R president.
I was against an investigation that morphed into an impeachment over lies about a blow job in a civil depo. And I was against it when it meant something. If all they end up with is the election violation, I would be against it here as well. Called consistency Ned. You should try it sometime.
This message has been edited 1 time(s).