I merely meant that whether or not you can explain complex theories upon which the scientific community has endorsed does not render the theories null and void.
That seems to be WestCoastIrish's argument here. He saw some factoid talking point that Hannity broadcast, and uses it to refute 100's of peer-reviewed papers unless you, Jimbasil, can personally explain to him why the 100's of peer reviewed papers refute Hannity's conclusions/questions.