Menu
UHND.com - Notre Dame Football, Basketball, & Recruiting
Football
2020 Football Schedule
2020 Football Coaching Staff
2020 Notre Dame Football Roster
2020 Football Scholarship Chart
Notre Dame Football Injury News & Updates
Notre Dame Football Highlights
NFL Fighting Irish
Past Seasons & Results
Game Archive
Player Archive
Recruiting
Class of 2021 Commit List
Class of 2020 Commit List
Class of 2019 Commit List
Class of 2018 Commit List
Notre Dame Recruiting Film Evaluations
Visits News
Archives
Basketball
Forums
Chat Room
Football Forum
Open Forum
Basketball Board
Ticket Exchange
Latest News
History
Notre Dame Heisman Trophy Winners
Notre Dame Rivalries
Notre Dame Bowl History
Notre Dame Traditions
Notre Dame National Championships
Notre Dame NFL Draft History
Touchdown Jesus
Notre Dame Football ESPN GameDay History
Notre Dame Stadium
Past Results
Videos
Gear
About
Advertise With Us
Contact Us
Our RSS Feeds
Community Rules
Privacy Policy
RSS
YouTube
Twitter
Facebook
Home
>
Forums
>
The Open Forum
Login
|
Register
Username
Password
Remember me
Sign in
Worthless? Bwahahahaha
Author:
Frank L
(45968 Posts - Joined: Sep 20, 2007)
Posted at 4:02 pm on Jan 9, 2019
View All
(no message)
Replies to: "Worthless? Bwahahahaha"
Hysterical. All you do is have to wait 5 mins & the reporting gets shot to bits. Chris, feel stupid?
[NT]
[
LINK
]
-
Cole
- 2:22pm 1/9/19
(39)
[View All]
You don’t have to feel it. You are it.
-
Frank L
- 4:00pm 1/9/19
You’ll note that he backed away from his original claim pretty fast
-
Chris94
- 6:06pm 1/9/19
You didn't read the NYTimes reporting. You have your facts wrong.
[NT]
-
Cole
- 4:28pm 1/9/19
What facts might they be genius?
[NT]
-
Frank L
- 4:39pm 1/9/19
1. Polling, not voter data. 2. Shared to please Manafort's Ukrainian friends, not Putin. But Orange
-
Cole
- 6:20pm 1/9/19
you refuse to learn
-
Chris94
- 8:18pm 1/9/19
You are wrong so often that you should be banned.
[NT]
[
LINK
]
-
Cole
- 7:38am 1/10/19
I said internal polling data genius. Passed to a GRU operative.
-
Frank L
- 8:14pm 1/9/19
You should be embarassed.
[NT]
[
LINK
]
-
Cole
- 8:26am 1/10/19
Uhm how? Like these two weren’t Putin allies? Like he didn’t give internal campaign data to a GRU
-
Frank L
- 11:15am 1/10/19
Cole not answering an inconvenient question? Shocking!
-
Chris94
- 4:32pm 1/9/19
He’s the worst type of enabler/apologist, but fun to mess with.
[NT]
-
Frank L
- 4:46pm 1/9/19
You voted for a rapist's enabler.
[NT]
-
Cole
- 6:18pm 1/9/19
Against an actual rapist, yeah.
[NT]
-
Frank L
- 8:15pm 1/9/19
If he was convicted, then he must have already paid his debt to society. Otherwise, he'd be in jail.
[NT]
-
NedoftheHill
- 9:06pm 1/9/19
You mean the one who was enabled?
[NT]
-
Frank L
- 9:32pm 1/9/19
You know why con men rarely get caught?
-
Rooney
- 4:55pm 1/9/19
Amen.
[NT]
-
ND1IRISH
- 8:41pm 1/9/19
Hard as this is to believe, you do not understand what this means.
-
Chris94
- 2:32pm 1/9/19
It might be something. It might not. More fun to think it might be something, though, am I right?
[NT]
-
NedoftheHill
- 2:41pm 1/9/19
Mueller apparently thinks it is something
-
Chris94
- 2:45pm 1/9/19
He thinks it is something that was lied about, not that the something was a crime.
-
NedoftheHill
- 4:26pm 1/9/19
As I keep saying we don’t know what he has or what he thinks.
-
Frank L
- 4:44pm 1/9/19
That's what I've been saying. We don't know. You sure do act like you know, though.
-
NedoftheHill
- 6:40pm 1/9/19
Really? None of that matters.
-
Frank L
- 8:17pm 1/9/19
I just gave you 8 different imlications that explain away what we know. Now, you can make your case.
-
NedoftheHill
- 9:10pm 1/9/19
Then give me an innocent explanation for what they did. C’mon boy you can do it.
-
Frank L
- 9:35pm 1/9/19
No law has been alleged to be violated. That's a good explanation most of the time.
[NT]
-
NedoftheHill
- 10:40pm 1/9/19
Which means you can’t. Figures.
[NT]
-
Frank L
- 8:24am 1/10/19
And how exactly do you know that?
-
Chris94
- 4:29pm 1/9/19
You call me out in this thread where you were just pantsed for your comments yesterday?
-
BaronVonZemo
- 5:59pm 1/9/19
Uh, what now?
[NT]
-
Chris94
- 6:04pm 1/9/19
Just reading portions of what you posted.
[NT]
-
NedoftheHill
- 4:33pm 1/9/19
Again, worthless "polling" data, not "voter" data, which is the mistake you keep making
-
Cole
- 2:36pm 1/9/19
This is like watching Clemson on Alabama in the 4th Q. Let's see if Chris gives up like Bama did.
[NT]
-
BaronVonZemo
- 6:00pm 1/9/19
Worthless? Bwahahahaha
[NT]
-
Frank L
- 4:02pm 1/9/19
Those are the words Manafort's lawyers used
-
Chris94
- 2:44pm 1/9/19
They used the word "polling." Please provide a link where they used "voter."
[
LINK
]
-
Cole
- 2:47pm 1/9/19
Miscommunication - I meant "polling" was the word his attorneys used
-
Chris94
- 2:55pm 1/9/19