Menu
UHND.com - Notre Dame Football, Basketball, & Recruiting UHND.com - Notre Dame Football, Basketball, & Recruiting

UHND.com - Notre Dame Football, Basketball, & Recruiting

UHND.com - Notre Dame Football, Basketball, & Recruiting UHND.com - Notre Dame Football, Basketball, & Recruiting
  • Football
    • 2024 Notre Dame Football Schedule
    • 2024 Notre Dame Roster
    • 2024 Notre Dame Coaching Staff
    • Injury News & Updates
    • Notre Dame Football Depth Charts
    • Notre Dame Point Spreads & Betting Odds
    • Notre Dame Transfers
    • NFL Fighting Irish
    • Game Archive
    • Player Archive
    • Past Seasons & Results
  • Recruiting
    • Commits
    • News & Rumors
    • Class of 2018 Commit List
    • Class of 2019 Commit List
    • Class of 2020 Commit List
    • Class of 2021 Commit List
    • Archives
  • History
    • Notre Dame Bowl History
    • Notre Dame NFL Draft History
    • Notre Dame Football ESPN GameDay History
    • Notre Dame Heisman Trophy Winners
    • Notre Dame Football National Championships
    • Notre Dame Football Rivalries
    • Notre Dame Stadium
    • Touchdown Jesus
  • Basketball
  • Forums
    • Chat Room
    • Football Forum
    • Open Forum
    • Basketball Board
    • Ticket Exchange
  • Videos
    • Notre Dame Basketball Highlights
    • Notre Dame Football Highlights
    • Notre Dame Football Recruiting Highlights
    • Notre Dame Player Highlights
    • Hype Videos
  • Latest News
  • Gear
  • About
    • Advertise With Us
    • Contact Us
    • Our RSS Feeds
    • Community Rules
    • Privacy Policy
  • RSS
  • YouTube
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Home > Forums > The Open Forum
Login | Register

Nah. We probably don't need more. And yet, we still use 57 year old planes.

Author: NedoftheHill (44720 Posts - Joined: Jun 29, 2011)
Posted at 6:00 pm on Jan 11, 2019
View All

That tells me that the 57 year old planes can do something that the 18 year old and the 30 year old planes can't do.

Maybe we should build some new B-52's to replace the old ones. Seems like an ageless design...like they got it right, and the technology hasn't improved much. But, mechanical fatigue is real. A 60 year old fuselage is...well, 60 years old. I'm just amazed that we are confident in 60 year old planes. No matter how you slice it, that is amazing.

But don't get me started on the nukes themselves. We haven't tested one in over 30 years. I've posted on that before. I just have to wonder how confident we can be in our ability to destroy the world. Probably a reasonable chance they will work, I guess.


Evil preaches tolerance until it is dominant, then it tries to silence good.

Replies to: "Nah. We probably don't need more. And yet, we still use 57 year old planes."

  • The newest B-52 in the Air Force fleet was built the same year as this truck... [IMAGE] - NedoftheHill - 12:49am 1/11/19 (10) [View All]
    • It's a good thing we also have - Mark - 11:51am 1/11/19
      • The B-52H is the only version still around [LINK] - Mark - 3:44pm 1/11/19
        • Nah. We probably don't need more. And yet, we still use 57 year old planes. - NedoftheHill - 6:00pm 1/11/19
          • They've always had wonky bomb bay doors. - Iggle - 9:49pm 1/11/19
            • Slim pickings on the technology there. [NT] - Frank L - 3:51pm 1/12/19
      • The original straight-wing turboprop is from 1946...when this truck was built. [IMAGE] - NedoftheHill - 3:14pm 1/11/19
      • Re: It's a good thing we also have this little bomb dropped in the 80's - jimbasil - 12:56pm 1/11/19
    • I'm clearly not an expert on weapons delivery, but what about the B-2s and all those billions? [NT] - Rooster - 11:47am 1/11/19
      • We have 21 B-2's, each with about 60% the payload of a B-52. - NedoftheHill - 3:17pm 1/11/19
      • As an aside I was reading about ADX Florence SuperMax - CC72 - 1:22pm 1/11/19
Close
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • RSS