I acknowledged people can be dubious as to their actual guilt of criminal wrongdoing. A lot of smart people who know a heck of a lot more about it than us have been, so that's fine. I don't begrudge a theory.
I don't mind Greenwald railing against the media coverage, if they fuck up they fuck up. I don't "give them a pass", I just take news with a grain of salt. Some things get confirmed and are proven true, some things aren't. I'd say they've gotten a hell of a lot more right than they have wrong. In that entire article he cites 15-20 examples, with the honorable mentions? How many stories have been written on Trump/Russia? Hundreds? Thousands? (I'd also note that in every one of his instances, the truth was exposed by media entities. They do police each other. Anecdotally, when the buzzfeed story broke, there were a lot of mainstream reporters saying they could not confirm this and that they were skeptical.)
For me, just looking at the timeline of events, without analysis or commentary about what it means, and take what's in the public record, it's hard to take the position that this is all a media creation. But, again, I don't begrudge a theory. And the main reason for my comment of "still not convinced" was the last time I was over here, you held this position, and a lot more has come out since then (the Trump Tower Moscow story for example), so I was more or less checking in. This is one of those things where our positions don't matter, either they did it or they didn't and we'll find out soon enough.