we can all talk about and as we all know, presidents do parlay their years in WH into future income, but proven or proved - it's just not there. So why use it as a point of defamation?
I used Uranium 1 as a comparison to another allegation of HRC - valid because it's just what you R's do. An example of falsehoods - HRC is not physically fit for office - you all played that card for months - it was untrue - Benghazi, how many hearings on that, that proved untrue and a enormous falsehood. So you see, there's plenty of grist for that comparison mill when you make those points.