about it anymore, then you’ll be totally fine with it. And I can promise you that it won’t be reported on thereafter by the sympathetic media.
Btw, MAS is 100% correct about your logical fallacy of numbers (volume of cases determining the importance of this). Your response even states “rarity doesn’t make it COMPLETELY unimportant”- still you imply that it does affect it’s importance when it does not. I can tell you the procedure in in the low thousands nation wide in those centers that honestly report them. Is that volume enough for you to assign importance? If not, where is your cut off? It would be helpful to know.
This message has been edited 3 time(s).