(no message)
Replies to: "Well Roberts is now the fifth, so expect some incremental improvement, but not a broad pronouncement"
- Don't drive while in possession of cash. - NedoftheHill - 12:07pm 2/3/19
(14) [View All]
- Republicans should have allowed Obama his SC justices - this issue would have been fixed - jimbasil - 1:57pm 2/3/19
- Total nonsense. [NT]
- NedoftheHill - 9:53pm 2/3/19
- Let's revisit this post after this June's decision, Ned. [NT] - BaronVonZemo - 12:05am 2/4/19
- We will get to see soon how much smoke you are blowing. it's headed to the SCOTUS this session. [NT] [LINK] - BaronVonZemo - 3:38pm 2/3/19
- Total nonsense. [NT]
- NedoftheHill - 9:53pm 2/3/19
- There are hundreds of examples, no trial, not even guilty, bye bye moola. [NT] - Rooster - 12:59pm 2/3/19
- There is an unreasonable fines/forfeiture case before SCOTUS this term. Should be interesting. - Frank L - 12:09pm 2/3/19
- If there is justice, SCOTUS will once and for all declare civil forfeiture unconstitutional. - NedoftheHill - 12:28pm 2/3/19
- Well Roberts is now the fifth, so expect some incremental improvement, but not a broad pronouncement [NT]
- Frank L - 12:45pm 2/3/19
- This issue is not really partisan, though. It's libertarian vs. statist, not right vs. left. - NedoftheHill - 1:07pm 2/3/19
- Agree, but you are also talking judicial restraint versus activism. Roberts likes to decide - Frank L - 1:19pm 2/3/19
- Judicial restraint vs. activism. OK. How does "deciding narrowly" figure into that? - NedoftheHill - 9:50pm 2/3/19
- As usual you overstate things. First of all it’s an excessive fines claim under the 8th Amendment. - Frank L - 10:12pm 2/3/19
- Incorrect. No fine is levied and collected. All cash is taken regardless of amount. You are reaching - NedoftheHill - 11:15pm 2/3/19
- I don’t think it’s okay. I am predicting what the Court may do. - Frank L - 7:54am 2/4/19
- Incorrect. No fine is levied and collected. All cash is taken regardless of amount. You are reaching - NedoftheHill - 11:15pm 2/3/19
- As usual you overstate things. First of all it’s an excessive fines claim under the 8th Amendment. - Frank L - 10:12pm 2/3/19
- Judicial restraint vs. activism. OK. How does "deciding narrowly" figure into that? - NedoftheHill - 9:50pm 2/3/19
- Agree, but you are also talking judicial restraint versus activism. Roberts likes to decide - Frank L - 1:19pm 2/3/19
- This issue is not really partisan, though. It's libertarian vs. statist, not right vs. left. - NedoftheHill - 1:07pm 2/3/19
- Well Roberts is now the fifth, so expect some incremental improvement, but not a broad pronouncement [NT]
- Frank L - 12:45pm 2/3/19
- If there is justice, SCOTUS will once and for all declare civil forfeiture unconstitutional. - NedoftheHill - 12:28pm 2/3/19
- Republicans should have allowed Obama his SC justices - this issue would have been fixed - jimbasil - 1:57pm 2/3/19