...that it was a he said/ she said and that since there was no other corroboration, they did not think that it was credible to publish at that time.
So (conor especially), WHY DID THEY REPORT ON KAVANAUGH THE WAY THEY DID AND WHY DID THEY THNK BLASY FORD WAS CREDIBLE ENOUGH TO REPORT AS THEY DID?
And why did they sit on it for a year until Northam fell out of favor with the Dem Party for not stepping down with Fairfax not joining the chorus to have him step down?
"Truth dies in darkness". Indeed. Perhaps another Super Bowl ad next year is in order?
Link: https://www.washingtonpost.com/local/va-lt-gov-justin-fairfax-denies-sex-assault-allegation-from-2004/2019/02/04/05fb0f6c-272b-11e9-ad53-824486280311_story.html?noredirect=on&utm_term=.161640c1f7e0