Where will the evidence be presented?

| Register

Where will the evidence be presented?

Author: conorlarkin (21015 Posts - Original UHND Member)

Posted at 8:07 pm on Feb 8, 2019

View All

Since you cling to the presumption of innocence (which can only be overcome by a unanimous jury convinced BRD of guilt), is it your position that sexual assault allegations against an elected official or political candidate are meaningless, unless and until the person is criminally charged and convicted by a jury?

The American Dream belongs to all of us. — Kamala Harris

Replies to: "Where will the evidence be presented?"

A second accuser against the lieutenant governor has come forward. - Cole - 5:37pm 2/8/19 (32) [View All]
- He’s issued a statement: “F that bitch too!” [NT] - TakethetrainKnute - 9:21am 2/9/19
  - This literally made me laugh out loud. Well done [NT] - Nigel Tufnel - 4:46pm 2/9/19
- Hopefully, he will be presumed innocent and evidence will be expected to be produced... - BaronVonZemo - 6:22pm 2/8/19
  - This is not a court of law. It’s politics. - Chris94 - 8:40pm 2/8/19
  - Where will the evidence be presented? - conorlarkin - 8:07pm 2/8/19
    - I think that without the accuser having previously filed charges or at least a report for decades, - BaronVonZemo - 12:27am 2/9/19
    - He can be criminally charged - CC72 - 9:26pm 2/8/19
      - Maybe, maybe not. Depends on the state. [NT] - NedoftheHill - 4:45pm 2/9/19
      - Yes. Of course. [NT] - conorlarkin - 9:33pm 2/8/19
    - Whats your standard? - Iggle - 9:08pm 2/8/19
      - It is not a math equation. See below thread. [NT] - conorlarkin - 9:16pm 2/8/19
        I read it. You’re a political hack. - Iggle - 9:19pm 2/8/19
        I sleep well, atop the moral high ground. - conorlarkin - 9:31pm 2/8/19
        * [NT] - Iggle - 9:48pm 2/8/19
  - I agree with your point, but it doesn't fully apply here. - Cole - 6:34pm 2/8/19
- Sounds like a perfect fit for the Supreme Court! - conorlarkin - 5:59pm 2/8/19
  - Excellent compilation of cliches. [NT] - Cole - 6:24pm 2/8/19
    - Everything I do is excellent. Schooling you is one such thing. [NT] - conorlarkin - 6:40pm 2/8/19
      - You may be a tad advanced for him. [NT] - Frank L - 6:47pm 2/8/19
        Any "Republican" like yourself who admits he voted for Hillary is, safe to say, - Cole - 4:59am 2/9/19
        Name calling is all ya got. [NT] - Frank L - 11:01am 2/9/19
        Also I’m proud to stand with the last good R president HW Bush in doing so. - Frank L - 10:11am 2/11/19
    - You would be a good judge of that being the cliche king. [NT] - Frank L - 6:25pm 2/8/19
  - Sounds like a double standard to me. If Bart was disqualified for SCOTUS, don’t know how you can say - Frank L - 6:16pm 2/8/19
    - No double standard. I expect Democrats to police their own. - conorlarkin - 6:39pm 2/8/19
      - Kavanaugh vehemently denied the allegations as well. They all do, trust me. - Frank L - 6:46pm 2/8/19
        I get it. Not disagreeing re the need to be consistent. - conorlarkin - 7:19pm 2/8/19
  - Or president. [NT] - NedoftheHill - 6:14pm 2/8/19
- Adios, Fairfax. [NT] - Chris94 - 5:52pm 2/8/19
  - There is no way all 3 of these guys go down if the fourth guy is a Republican. - Iggle - 9:15pm 2/8/19
    - Well...no one's denying it. Too much to expect open honesty on that, even in the Open. [NT] - NedoftheHill - 4:50pm 2/9/19
  - Why? Bart and Orange have given him the playbook. Just say fuck you, I’m not leaving. - Frank L - 6:52pm 2/8/19