therefore you haven't lit a fire?
Well Bullshit to that - Carolla was making what he thought was a clever observation when it actually isn't because there is no correlation between an arsonist and a bigot - the physical action of either isn't the same nor is the idea.
You like it because you think it is an intelligent way to frame an argument that give you an avenue for justification for being a racist making racist claims like his side-kick sitting next to him. It doesn't.
It's like the 4 guys going out for a beer - one guy has more money than the other three therefore he should buy and the story goes on from there and this is a correlation for paying taxes which it isn't, its just mumbo jumbo that sounds intelligent.