Regarding the DNC fix of the primary results, it is a fact. You are claiming that Hillary would have won regardless, so it doesn't matter. yet the votes of subsequent primaries are inextricably linked to the momentum of previous primaries. So you can't really say what you claim "that Hillary was going to win anyways".
Now, let's talk about another example of "proven" things since you have been undeservedly been mentioning this as if it is an attribute you care about personally.
How is it that you support McCabe starting an investigation against a sitting president with no proven evidence whatsoever? On the very day that he began this investigation, he had FBI people meeting with a political operative on the Hillary Clinton Campaign payroll (Christopher Steele) in London about obtaining and passing on a document that it has been revealed the DOJ knew to be false, and knew to have ties to Russia sourcing for some of the most salacious portions (The Dossier). How is it appropriate for the DOJ to use this as a source to justify a FISA warrant on Trump? (Testimony has revealed that they knew they needed it included to secure the FISA).
There was no proven evidence that started this whole witch hunt on Trump. THAT is the most amazing revelation from the treasonous McCabe. That along with the fact that he took it upon himself to overstepped his bounds by having a meeting to probe the possibility of invoking the 25th amendment. Tell me Chris, is that the purview of a bureacrat in the FBI? Is that an FBI or DOJ function? Should he not have taken this to congress and the VP who have the authority to do this?
All of this with no proven evidence, yet you think him a patriot. That is hypocrisy.
And regarding 2008, what if the DNC DID WANT Barack over Hillary, and that is the only reason that it happened? Your claim that Obama being chosen over Hillary does not support your argument whatsoever. It is a non sequitor.