I was just suggesting that the basis for it being a national issue is not well founded.
Interestingly, you could have agreed with me. I was proposing a compromise position to your king of the country idea on the one hand, and the do nothing idea on the other. Let the states decide. But, you are so inclined to be a disagreeable ass that you can't even contemplate that someone might be adding to the discussion. You just assume I missed the point (I guess because I didn't disagree with you, but you seem to assume I must disagree with you)...which means you missed my point.
There is not a single person on this forum who makes it more difficult for others to agree with them than you. You are the king of alienating even those who agree with you.