presidential election voting system and creating non-partisan organizations to get into the game. But let me talk about election voting solution anyway.
Their proposed voting system basically is just France/Louisiana open primary system and they want to have it at federal election level, which is just very silly.
What if a candidate get over 50% votes in primary election? This is going to make general election meaningless. But it could also induce unnecessary error on voters because many voters may not go to vote in general election by thinking that candidate winning over 50% in primary is very safe. Also, unlike traditional party-primary system, the open primary system tends to elect fringe candidates. Racist (David Duke ) vs crook (John Edwards) is a good example. Ok, I know their solution isn't exactly Louisiana. They let voters have 4 choices in general elections and prioritize their choices. This is just impractical. How many voters can have 4 candidates? If they only fill 1 or 2 or 3 candidates in their ballot, are you going to invalid their votes?
Isn't their so-called non-partisan organization just another party? Why bring another player into this competition, not change the nature of competition as they claimed? I also think emergence of Trump falsified their solution. They answered the question of emergence of Trump. But their answer is not convincing to me. Trump made me believe 1. The change can happen within party itself; 2 Trump is the best bipartisan president from R that D should work with. But unfortunately the bitterness of losing election and Trump's own character issues made D lose this great bipartisan opportunity.