An individual's right to choose to swing their fist ends at someone else's face.
Freedom is not anarchy. Freedom does not include having the right to kill someone. Same thing with choice. I can choose to drive my car, but not in a way that is intended to kill someone else. So, a pro-life individual can easily say that they support freedom and choice 100%: do what you want...just don't kill anyone.
But, you cannot say that, because you support abortion. You support the right to kill other human beings...either because you deny their humanity (in violation of scientific teaching) or because you deny humans their basic human right to not be killed (in violation of basic, even secular human morality). You are not 100% for freedom. Abortion stops the beating heart of a unique human individual. That is a fact. You support that. I don't, because I oppose aggression against all individuals, and I have consistently argued that way today.
I support opposition to the aggression of abortion against young humans, and I argued for charity towards the mothers of those young humans (which is the one thing I thought we could all agree on, but you come after me for saying that). Those are perfectly consistent and non-hypocritical positions. If you disagree, point out with specificity where you think I'm wrong. Or, you could just throw another insult, or generality at me, and pretend you are making an argument when you are not.
Regarding Meatloaf: His decisions impacted only himself. He made choices. He lived by those choices. He knowingly died by those choices. Only a liberal would call that failure, because he lived free of state coercion.