You said: "I do not have the right to interfere with any woman’s decision on her body which includes her reproductive choices."
We agree here. I think where we disagree is after reproduction has already occurred. Once there is another human being, with a different set of DNA involved, reproduction has already occurred.
Also, I would never say that any human individual can choose to kill another human individual--we disagree on that point. You think that is ok, but I do not.
You said: "I do not see abortion as a form of birth control and if asked by a woman what would I chose I would decline abortion as a choice.
Again, we agree here.
You said: "But the audacity of a man thinking he has the God given right to force his opinion upon a woman is most vile and loathsome - despicable. Arcane to men their decisions doesn’t mean a man is entitled to over rule a woman’s life.
Agree. We have some good common ground here. I don't think I can force my opinion on anyone, man or woman.
Of course, I do believe (as do most people) that the government has a legitimate power and responsibility to stop individuals from killing other individuals, which is what abortion is. Most people who support the right to have an abortion change their opinion on when deadly force can be used when it comes to abortion, but I apply the rule consistently: An individual human should not be able to kill another non-aggressing human individual. I am 100% consistent on this.