The problem is that you think prohibiting a woman from killing her child is impinging on her rights. It is never anyone's right to kill their child or any other non-aggressing human individual. You are not being consistent here. Why do you think it is ok for a woman to kill her child?
We are close in that we agree it is wrong to take a human life during 99% of a person's life. You think it is ok to take a human life during that 1% of the time it is in the womb, and I don't. I think it is wrong to kill a non-aggressing human 100% of the time. You are the one making special cases here, not me. Why do you think it is ok to kill sometimes, and not others? Why do you think aggression is ok in the case of abortion, but not other times?