Regardless, we have two communicable diseases spread through choices that people make. You've chosen to evade it by unilaterally declaring that analogies shall be ruled out if the other communicable diseases being compared are not airborne. You're shuffling like this to avoid addressing the analogy in question. I might add that in saner times, most would regard it silly to compare something as life-threatening as HIV (and widespread, too), to a virus with a 98+% survival rate.
Particularly in communities and locations where HIV is prominent, what choices are you comfortable with the state taking away from people? What about HIV Passports? Do you think similar measures might save a few lives in San Fran or Seattle, for example?
But if you insist on being silly, I take it you are for mandatory flu vaccinations, right?