We don't know the universe of realistic outcomes in Libya and Egypt. We don't know if the outcome now is better than the median outcome. You've just come to the conclusion that the outcome there was a failure. Failure compared to what? Also, we don't know the probabilities of the different outcomes.
We don't know if the play was the highest probability play. The very best policy may nevertheless produce what you consider a "failure". Foreign policy is not an exact science.
So yes. Process matters. If Trump bets on rolling box cars, and Obama bets on rolling seven for the same odds, it doesn't mean Trump had our best interests in mind. It means his ego got in the way of our best interest. Even if he ends up rolling a 12 it does not change things.