committed due to the fact that a sitting prez couldn’t be charged. What he cleared up was that it wasn’t a situation where they had concluded that a crime had been committed but charges could not be brought due to immunity. They didn’t decide one way or another.
Even Barr’s own summary said that the report did not exculpate the president from having committed a crime. If the report had, he wouldn’t have written that. No decision was made one way or another. Now run along. You have the mindset of a ten year old.