Questions illustrate how complicated the ruling is and the technicalities of the law involved. What is the legal definition of collusion? Versus, what do reasonable people understand collusion, cooperation, and conspiracy to mean. The most frustrating thing for me is not that a wealthy and high placed official ( the highest official) did not get indicted or charged, but that no one is talking about his actions and behaviors. I don’t believe there is any factual dispute with the contacts and the embracing of Russian assistance during the campaign. I don’t think there is any dispute about bold face lying about negotiating business deals in Russia throughout the campaign. No dispute about Helsinki or the G7. Is there any doubts about Trumps attempts both direct and indirect to obstruct the investigation? Maybe, but Clinton was impeached for much less. There are two tiers of justice. This sleaze ball got off the hook but his actions make him the most illegitimate president in my lifetime. If you want to hang your hat on the fact that his Attorney General did not charge him that’s fine by me but not being indicted does not mean he is innocent
Go Irish