point out where the evidence of quid pro quo is from his statement. Doubt you even read it (you seldom read what you linked anyway). The only evidence is the conversation content he provided between Pence and Ukraine president, which is consistent with Trump admin stand on Ukraine aid holdout: 1 European need doing more 2 Ukraine need cleaning up more corruption. Everything else is just his own opinions, i.e. his suspicion that there is a quid pro quo, which he admitted other officials already explained it to him this is not quid pro quo. So, forget that call, forget anonymous whistleblower, let's just grab one diplomate's opinion as evidence for your narrative.