Menu
UHND.com - Notre Dame Football, Basketball, & Recruiting
Football
2023 Notre Dame Football Schedule
2023 Notre Dame Roster
2022 Notre Dame Coaching Staff
Injury News & Updates
Notre Dame Football Depth Charts
Notre Dame Point Spreads & Betting Odds
Notre Dame Transfers
NFL Fighting Irish
Game Archive
Player Archive
Past Seasons & Results
Recruiting
Commits
News & Rumors
Class of 2018 Commit List
Class of 2019 Commit List
Class of 2020 Commit List
Class of 2021 Commit List
Archives
History
Notre Dame Bowl History
Notre Dame NFL Draft History
Notre Dame Football ESPN GameDay History
Notre Dame Heisman Trophy Winners
Notre Dame Football National Championships
Notre Dame Football Rivalries
Notre Dame Stadium
Touchdown Jesus
Basketball
Forums
Chat Room
Football Forum
Open Forum
Basketball Board
Ticket Exchange
Videos
Notre Dame Basketball Highlights
Notre Dame Football Highlights
Notre Dame Football Recruiting Highlights
Notre Dame Player Highlights
Hype Videos
Latest News
Gear
About
Advertise With Us
Contact Us
Our RSS Feeds
Community Rules
Privacy Policy
RSS
YouTube
Twitter
Facebook
Home
>
Forums
>
The Open Forum
Login
|
Register
Username
Password
Remember me
Sign in
Uhm, you don’t think demanding a political favor to release already appropriated aid isn’t bribery?
Author:
Frank L
(57007 Posts - Joined: Sep 20, 2007)
Posted at 10:13 am on Nov 15, 2019
View All
Read the statute man.
Replies to: "Uhm, you don’t think demanding a political favor to release already appropriated aid isn’t bribery?"
Bribery... what does it mean as an impeachable offense? As in, what was the intent of that being
-
IrishMac
- 5:35pm 11/14/19
(15)
[View All]
It's the Dems newest buzzword, after failing with 'collusion', 'quid pro quo' and 'extortion'
-
Nigel Tufnel
- 8:34am 11/15/19
Uhm, you don’t think demanding a political favor to release already appropriated aid isn’t bribery?
-
Frank L
- 10:13am 11/15/19
Bribery, Abuse of Power, Obstructing Congress = Trifecta for Impeachment.
-
conorlarkin
- 9:44pm 11/14/19
You forgot one...........
[NT]
[
IMAGE
]
-
BaronVonZemo
- 12:14am 11/15/19
18 U.S.C. 201 unannotated
[NT]
[
LINK
]
-
ND521
- 5:43pm 11/14/19
Sections (b)(2)(A) and (c)(1)(B). Pretty clear.
[NT]
-
Frank L
- 6:21pm 11/14/19
(c)(1)(B) would seem to apply IF proven that the accusations are legit. The way I read (b)(2)(A),
-
IrishMac
- 9:55am 11/15/19
Not bad, How are you with the Federal Rules, the Rules of Evidence and the Due Process Clause?
[NT]
-
Curly1918
- 7:59pm 11/14/19
As you are doubtless aware, an impeachment proceeding is not a criminal trial.
[NT]
-
ND521
- 8:10pm 11/14/19
The Senate sets the rules for the trial... and shall impose whatever rules of evidence they desire
-
Curly1918
- 6:01am 11/15/19
Except that the Chief Justice presides and I doubt he will allow Gym Jordanesque type behavior.
-
Frank L
- 10:08am 11/15/19
The Chief Justice will be the referee... but he will not establish the rules
-
Curly1918
- 11:03am 11/15/19
He can disallow witnesses without relevant testimony.
-
Frank L
- 2:50pm 11/15/19
.
[NT]
-
Frank L
- 10:11am 11/15/19
son~~~
[NT]
-
rhollis
- 5:41pm 11/14/19