That's kind of how this often works in real life civil lawsuits, when an expert opines on a subject, depending on the zealousness of the attorney...it would be worse in Capitol hearing prep where every Congressman is overzealous. Of course, these people aren't experts opining on a subject they are trained on.
Maybe they bother with that first draft step just in case Jordan asks, "Did you write that? Did you consult with anyone on your statement?" But, they may not even worry about it.
But, as I point out to conor, all that is beside the point. The issue, IMO, is as I said below: Are they an advocate or a witness? They are acting like advocates with these statements.
This message has been edited 4 time(s).