You do understand what pondering is, right? You may have noted the "we will see" at the end of the post?
I also know that I have a great grasp on exactly what is going on. And I have no respect for partisan hacks like that Stanford "prof" who put out the hypothetical about Trump and LA emergency relief. First off, she intentionally makes up a scenario that the less engaged viewers can easily take as fact when it is fiction.
On top of that, it is a false analogy since she assumes Trump had conversations with the Ukrainians that never happened and of course for which there is no evidence.
Finally, this "witness" assumes Trump's guilt when he has never even faced a trial.
Upon looking at her backgroun, the "prof" is an avid HRC backer and donor who was on the very short list for the SCOTUS had HRC won. She is obviously bitter.