Menu
UHND.com - Notre Dame Football, Basketball, & Recruiting
Football
2023 Notre Dame Football Schedule
2023 Notre Dame Roster
2022 Notre Dame Coaching Staff
Injury News & Updates
Notre Dame Football Depth Charts
Notre Dame Point Spreads & Betting Odds
Notre Dame Transfers
NFL Fighting Irish
Game Archive
Player Archive
Past Seasons & Results
Recruiting
Commits
News & Rumors
Class of 2018 Commit List
Class of 2019 Commit List
Class of 2020 Commit List
Class of 2021 Commit List
Archives
History
Notre Dame Bowl History
Notre Dame NFL Draft History
Notre Dame Football ESPN GameDay History
Notre Dame Heisman Trophy Winners
Notre Dame Football National Championships
Notre Dame Football Rivalries
Notre Dame Stadium
Touchdown Jesus
Basketball
Forums
Chat Room
Football Forum
Open Forum
Basketball Board
Ticket Exchange
Videos
Notre Dame Basketball Highlights
Notre Dame Football Highlights
Notre Dame Football Recruiting Highlights
Notre Dame Player Highlights
Hype Videos
Latest News
Gear
About
Advertise With Us
Contact Us
Our RSS Feeds
Community Rules
Privacy Policy
RSS
YouTube
Twitter
Facebook
Home
>
Forums
>
The Open Forum
Login
|
Register
Username
Password
Remember me
Sign in
The Reid Doctrine, which McConnell followed, is to use all power available to you at the moment.
Author:
NedoftheHill
(41128 Posts - Joined: Jun 29, 2011)
Posted at 5:34 pm on Dec 4, 2019
View All
Tradition or precedent for restraint be damned.
This message has been edited 1 time(s).
Evil preaches tolerance until it is dominant, then it tries to silence good.
Replies to: "The Reid Doctrine, which McConnell followed, is to use all power available to you at the moment."
Question re: S.C. appointment for all of you...
-
jakers
- 4:19pm 12/4/19
(38)
[View All]
Stupid move by McConnell, Garland was never going to pass. But he did follow a precedent.
[NT]
-
THEISMANCARR
- 10:17pm 12/4/19
This is what the impeachment is all about... control of the legal system.
-
Curly1918
- 7:15pm 12/4/19
Right. They want to make his appointment illegitimate or impossible.
[NT]
-
NedoftheHill
- 7:32pm 12/4/19
You forget something mcConnell said in that process.......
-
BaronVonZemo
- 7:08pm 12/4/19
Mitch would just need to say he “heard” the Garland complaints and wouldn’t want to revisit them
[NT]
-
WestCoastIrishFan
- 5:46pm 12/4/19
There is a 100% chance that there would be a new justice confirmed before November 2020
-
Chris94
- 4:52pm 12/4/19
Re: There is a 100% chance that there would be a new justice confirmed before November 2020
-
MarkHarman
- 6:38pm 12/4/19
Trump and GOP very likely have their nominee lined up.
-
conorlarkin
- 4:42pm 12/4/19
It might be the conservative ND women grad. Barrett, I think her name is.
[NT]
-
THEISMANCARR
- 10:19pm 12/4/19
I agree with this (and Chris's post above).
-
jakers
- 5:23pm 12/4/19
I agree, there would certainly be an uproar
-
Chris94
- 6:05pm 12/4/19
Agreed. and the Left has secret dirt - real or created - all set for any and all potential nominees
-
BaronVonZemo
- 7:13pm 12/4/19
They'll likely go after family members of the nominee. Maybe the kids.
[NT]
-
NedoftheHill
- 7:34pm 12/4/19
The nominee will be bullet proof.
-
conorlarkin
- 5:59pm 12/4/19
Thanks, I had not heard that possibility.
[NT]
-
jakers
- 8:17pm 12/4/19
Amy Coney Barrett will be the replacement for Ginsburg if trump gets a pick. And the big objection
-
BaronVonZemo
- 7:11pm 12/4/19
Possible choice, but may not have enough time on the bench.
-
conorlarkin
- 9:00pm 12/4/19
Another male (would be 3rd he appointed seems unlikely), esp for Ginsburg. 5 yrs on circuit is not
-
BaronVonZemo
- 10:45pm 12/4/19
.
[NT]
-
BaronVonZemo
- 10:42pm 12/4/19
Assuming no background issues, Hardiman would be a very good choice.
-
Frank L
- 7:08pm 12/4/19
Did he go to any parties in high school or college? We can't let those types of people be justices.
[NT]
-
NedoftheHill
- 7:31pm 12/4/19
Kavs did a little more than that. He was a regular drunk dick. They get remembered.
[NT]
-
Frank L
- 8:34pm 12/4/19
Friend of mine went to school with Kavanaugh. He says you are wrong.
[NT]
-
NedoftheHill
- 10:48pm 12/4/19
Plenty of others have publicly said I’m not.
[NT]
-
Frank L
- 11:11pm 12/4/19
Yeah, but they didn't know Kavanaugh.
-
NedoftheHill
- 11:40pm 12/4/19
Nah, I think they did.
-
Frank L
- 11:48pm 12/4/19
Mitch will force the nominee through. He would be crazy not to do so.
-
Frank L
- 4:35pm 12/4/19
Agreed with this & other posts. McConnell would "pull a Reid," hypocrisy accusations be damned
[
IMAGE
]
-
NedoftheHill
- 5:38pm 12/4/19
Oh it will be a shitshow on trashing whomever it is.
-
Frank L
- 7:07pm 12/4/19
The Kavanaugh hearing was to warn future nominees: Don't let Trump appoint you or we will F you over
[NT]
-
NedoftheHill
- 7:30pm 12/4/19
They didn’t F over Gorsuch like that. Cause they couldn’t.
-
Frank L
- 8:32pm 12/4/19
I don't think you have any evidence to back up that post.
[NT]
-
NedoftheHill
- 10:49pm 12/4/19
Huh, the part about Gorsuch? He got zero personal attacks. The part about Bart?
-
Frank L
- 11:10pm 12/4/19
Should follow McConnell doctrine at this point, which was wrong.
[NT]
-
iairishcheeks
- 4:25pm 12/4/19
The Reid Doctrine, which McConnell followed, is to use all power available to you at the moment.
-
NedoftheHill
- 5:34pm 12/4/19
I see only one tiny little crack for him to try to wiggle through.
-
jakers
- 4:40pm 12/4/19
makes no difference--we
[NT]
-
Hank the Tank
- 8:29pm 12/4/19
we'll a new justice
[NT]
-
Hank the Tank
- 8:30pm 12/4/19