Wouldn’t have felt the need to quote the whole thing out of context in an effort to make it look better whil still paying the lip service you feel is PC.
You also admire her for her knowledge of the law?! Did you especially like her assumption of Trump’s guilt without there even having been a trial yet? The “expert witness” didn’t say “If Trump did these things”, she instead said, “When and because Trump did these things”.
Amateur bias. Unprofessional. Living in the fake world of academia where her aberrant thinking goes unquestioned and her tenure protects her. Even a first year law student could see the problem with her as an expert, but not you. Your partisanship rationalizes all things.
This message has been edited 1 time(s).