Menu
UHND.com - Notre Dame Football, Basketball, & Recruiting
Football
2023 Notre Dame Football Schedule
2023 Notre Dame Roster
2022 Notre Dame Coaching Staff
Injury News & Updates
Notre Dame Football Depth Charts
Notre Dame Point Spreads & Betting Odds
Notre Dame Transfers
NFL Fighting Irish
Game Archive
Player Archive
Past Seasons & Results
Recruiting
Commits
News & Rumors
Class of 2018 Commit List
Class of 2019 Commit List
Class of 2020 Commit List
Class of 2021 Commit List
Archives
History
Notre Dame Bowl History
Notre Dame NFL Draft History
Notre Dame Football ESPN GameDay History
Notre Dame Heisman Trophy Winners
Notre Dame Football National Championships
Notre Dame Football Rivalries
Notre Dame Stadium
Touchdown Jesus
Basketball
Forums
Chat Room
Football Forum
Open Forum
Basketball Board
Ticket Exchange
Videos
Notre Dame Basketball Highlights
Notre Dame Football Highlights
Notre Dame Football Recruiting Highlights
Notre Dame Player Highlights
Hype Videos
Latest News
Gear
About
Advertise With Us
Contact Us
Our RSS Feeds
Community Rules
Privacy Policy
RSS
YouTube
Twitter
Facebook
Home
>
Forums
>
The Open Forum
Login
|
Register
Username
Password
Remember me
Sign in
Including exclusionary rules, barring evidence gained improperly?
Author:
NedoftheHill
(40961 Posts - Joined: Jun 29, 2011)
Posted at 1:07 pm on Dec 12, 2019
View All
(no message)
This message has been edited 1 time(s).
Evil preaches tolerance until it is dominant, then it tries to silence good.
Replies to: "Including exclusionary rules, barring evidence gained improperly?"
Senate trial with no witnesses?
[
LINK
]
-
Curly1918
- 11:18am 12/12/19
(13)
[View All]
Yes what an open and fair process it’s going to be in comparison to the HOR.
[NT]
-
Frank L
- 11:57am 12/12/19
The last thing the GOP wants are live witnesses and more testimony/evidence.
-
conorlarkin
- 11:41am 12/12/19
Oh please, they will exonerate Trump. But there are interesting rumblings that they could hurt
-
BaronVonZemo
- 1:41pm 12/12/19
If this takes down multiple senators who are doing that, it would be a net good.
[NT]
-
NedoftheHill
- 4:35pm 12/12/19
The last thing the Dems want is an application of the Federal Rules of Evidence
-
Curly1918
- 12:41pm 12/12/19
Fine with me, so long as all Crim Rules of Procedure apply.
-
conorlarkin
- 1:02pm 12/12/19
Justice Roberts would quash anything that stepped over the executive privilege red line
-
Curly1918
- 2:27pm 12/12/19
Which means most of the evidence would come in.
[NT]
-
Frank L
- 6:08pm 12/12/19
Including exclusionary rules, barring evidence gained improperly?
[NT]
-
NedoftheHill
- 1:07pm 12/12/19
Of course. Trump can file his Rule 12 and Rule 41 motions.
-
conorlarkin
- 1:17pm 12/12/19
Never said it was in the FRCP.
-
NedoftheHill
- 1:55pm 12/12/19
Is that a double dog dare?
[NT]
-
NedoftheHill
- 11:45am 12/12/19
Careful there...do NOT let conor goad you into anything foolish...
[NT]
[
IMAGE
]
-
TakethetrainKnute
- 12:39pm 12/12/19