Menu
UHND.com - Notre Dame Football, Basketball, & Recruiting UHND.com - Notre Dame Football, Basketball, & Recruiting

UHND.com - Notre Dame Football, Basketball, & Recruiting

UHND.com - Notre Dame Football, Basketball, & Recruiting UHND.com - Notre Dame Football, Basketball, & Recruiting
  • Football
    • 2020 Football Schedule
    • 2020 Football Coaching Staff
    • 2020 Notre Dame Football Roster
    • 2020 Football Scholarship Chart
    • Notre Dame Football Injury News & Updates
    • Notre Dame Football Highlights
    • NFL Fighting Irish
    • Past Seasons & Results
    • Game Archive
    • Player Archive
  • Recruiting
    • Class of 2021 Commit List
    • Class of 2020 Commit List
    • Class of 2019 Commit List
    • Class of 2018 Commit List
    • Notre Dame Recruiting Film Evaluations
    • Visits News
    • Archives
  • Basketball
  • Forums
    • Chat Room
    • Football Forum
    • Open Forum
    • Basketball Board
    • Ticket Exchange
  • Latest News
  • History
    • Notre Dame Heisman Trophy Winners
    • Notre Dame Rivalries
    • Notre Dame Bowl History
    • Notre Dame Traditions
    • Notre Dame National Championships
    • Notre Dame NFL Draft History
    • Touchdown Jesus
    • Notre Dame Football ESPN GameDay History
    • Notre Dame Stadium
    • Past Results
  • Videos
  • Gear
  • About
    • Advertise With Us
    • Contact Us
    • Our RSS Feeds
    • Community Rules
    • Privacy Policy
  • RSS
  • YouTube
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Home > Forums > The Open Forum
Login | Register

University wants to pretend that someone is not the biological sex they are. That is anti-science.

Author: NedoftheHill (31278 Posts - Joined: Jun 29, 2011)
Posted at 11:01 pm on Feb 20, 2020
View All

Science tells us the genes which determine sex. Science tells us the physical characteristics that determine sex. That is how science is involved.

They want us to pretend that science is wrong. That is anti-science.

Let me know if you need me to explain anything else.


This message has been edited 1 time(s).

First Freedom, then Glory—when that fails, wealth, vice, corruption—barbarism at last. - Byron

Replies to: "University wants to pretend that someone is not the biological sex they are. That is anti-science."

  • Preferred Pronoun Lawsuit Dismissed [LINK] - MAS - 8:05pm 2/20/20 (26) [View All]
    • The anti-science movement is strong. Very strange. - NedoftheHill - 8:56pm 2/20/20
      • He claimed using a certain pronoun was against his religious beliefs. - Chris94 - 10:23pm 2/20/20
        • University wants to pretend that someone is not the biological sex they are. That is anti-science. - NedoftheHill - 11:01pm 2/20/20
          • The prof’s religious beliefs motivate him, not science. - Chris94 - 11:42pm 2/20/20
            • Re-read my posts. I'm talking about the motivations of the University. - NedoftheHill - 10:04am 2/21/20
            • it’s clear where you come down on religious freedom and conscientious objection(and science because - BaronVonZemo - 8:07am 2/21/20
              • Pronouns can be “scientifically accurate”? Just stop. - Chris94 - 8:17am 2/21/20
                • Has to be difficult to remember a bunch of individual preferred pronouns. [NT] - iairishcheeks - 5:37pm 2/21/20
                • You're a sophist. As you know and as everyone knows, the pronoun issue is inextricably tied to... - MAS - 4:40pm 2/21/20
                • What pronoun should we use for you? - NedoftheHill - 10:06am 2/21/20
                  • What about people that refer to their boats with feminine pronouns? - ND_in_DRO - 4:19pm 2/21/20
                    • Interesting point. Is that why we use "gender" for humans now, instead of "sex" - NedoftheHill - 12:47am 2/23/20
                    • Depends on the boat's gender identity of course. - iairishcheeks - 5:32pm 2/21/20
            • Does,the larger issue of gender pronouns have anything to do with science? - MAS - 12:57am 2/21/20
          • What, you think Chris hesitates to boldly call out this imbecilic nonsense, just as he would... - MAS - 11:13pm 2/20/20
        • White supremacists. - MAS - 10:48pm 2/20/20
          • You love to overreact about fringe nonsense. Who am I to rain on your parade. [NT] - Chris94 - 11:01pm 2/20/20
            • Consciously fringe but unconsciously fundamental - Curly1918 - 5:36am 2/21/20
            • White supremacists. - MAS - 11:10pm 2/20/20
      • No, but a public institution mandating speech in this regard is patently Orwellian. - MAS - 9:11pm 2/20/20
        • Agreed. [NT] - NedoftheHill - 10:22pm 2/20/20
        • This case highlights the problem of liberal judges and further convinces me to vote conservatively. [NT] - BaronVonZemo - 10:10pm 2/20/20
          • I usually vote for Democrats. However, for state and local judges, I will not vote for liberals. - MAS - 10:30pm 2/20/20
            • The higher up a judge who believes Constitution is a “living, breathing document”,the more dangerous - BaronVonZemo - 10:59pm 2/20/20
              • Working at what??? - MAS - 11:19pm 2/20/20
                • It’s working at improving his % of votes from non-traditional GOP demographics - BaronVonZemo - 11:23pm 2/20/20
Close
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • RSS