Menu
UHND.com - Notre Dame Football, Basketball, & Recruiting UHND.com - Notre Dame Football, Basketball, & Recruiting

UHND.com - Notre Dame Football, Basketball, & Recruiting

UHND.com - Notre Dame Football, Basketball, & Recruiting UHND.com - Notre Dame Football, Basketball, & Recruiting
  • Football
    • 2024 Notre Dame Football Schedule
    • 2024 Notre Dame Roster
    • 2024 Notre Dame Coaching Staff
    • Injury News & Updates
    • Notre Dame Football Depth Charts
    • Notre Dame Point Spreads & Betting Odds
    • Notre Dame Transfers
    • NFL Fighting Irish
    • Game Archive
    • Player Archive
    • Past Seasons & Results
  • Recruiting
    • Commits
    • News & Rumors
    • Class of 2018 Commit List
    • Class of 2019 Commit List
    • Class of 2020 Commit List
    • Class of 2021 Commit List
    • Archives
  • History
    • Notre Dame Bowl History
    • Notre Dame NFL Draft History
    • Notre Dame Football ESPN GameDay History
    • Notre Dame Heisman Trophy Winners
    • Notre Dame Football National Championships
    • Notre Dame Football Rivalries
    • Notre Dame Stadium
    • Touchdown Jesus
  • Basketball
  • Forums
    • Chat Room
    • Football Forum
    • Open Forum
    • Basketball Board
    • Ticket Exchange
  • Videos
    • Notre Dame Basketball Highlights
    • Notre Dame Football Highlights
    • Notre Dame Football Recruiting Highlights
    • Notre Dame Player Highlights
    • Hype Videos
  • Latest News
  • Gear
  • About
    • Advertise With Us
    • Contact Us
    • Our RSS Feeds
    • Community Rules
    • Privacy Policy
  • RSS
  • YouTube
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Home > Forums > The Open Forum
Login | Register

Did you really read it? The author pointed out the flaw of current models & the claim based on

Author: Eli (9555 Posts - Original UHND Member)
Posted at 4:44 pm on Apr 1, 2020
View All

these models that "the measures have saved lives" which is deceitfully cut off at some future moment. They ignored the lives that would be lost soon after the cutoff in the scenario with their measure policies. I think we can all agree on benefits and risks of flattem the curve if we get honest information about it from the MSM and their experts. After that, we can think what kind of social distancing measure (strict or loose, none) we can take.

In response to your trivial point, those flawed models the authors pointed to didn't factor possibility of treatments being developed either. That's X factor, can't be quantified and therefore shouldn't be in any models.


Replies to: "Did you really read it? The author pointed out the flaw of current models & the claim based on"

  • Time to stop deceiving/misleading the public on flatten the curve and social distancing, and give [LINK] - Eli - 3:23pm 4/1/20 (8) [View All]
    • It's also time to stop misleading the public on Bat Boy. - LehighND - 5:57pm 4/1/20
    • You're suggesting in all this, social distancing and other efforts to mitigate contracting the virus - jimbasil - 5:10pm 4/1/20
      • Ask him what he did at Tienamen that he isn’t exactly proud of. - Frank L - 5:12pm 4/1/20
        • I'm afraid to. [NT] - jimbasil - 5:19pm 4/1/20
    • I tried to explain this to Chris who told me I made an incredibly stupid statement. But the - BaronVonZemo - 3:34pm 4/1/20
      • It remains an incredibly stupid statement. And that mathematician is making the same mistake. - Chris94 - 3:54pm 4/1/20
        • Did you really read it? The author pointed out the flaw of current models & the claim based on - Eli - 4:44pm 4/1/20
          • I see. The MSM is lying about the plague. I should have known! - Chris94 - 4:58pm 4/1/20
Close
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • RSS