non hot spot regions. Even management of hot spot regions should be re-evaluated in light of the findings. I'll link the initial findings of the USC study - for the Stanford study, Google is your friend, I can't link 2 on same post.
I agree with what we did, but the new information calls for a reevaluation and loosening of draconian measures. It clearly indicates that most of the country can get back to work. No there won't be "no risk", but while there is always some risk even with the yearly flu, the risk from Coronavirus will be plenty low enough to be less than the alternative risks of continued shut down.
From here on out, it is ALL about politics. We know who will oppose, and we know who will support........but we also know that from a medical perspective, it is reasonable to change back to a model where the at risk people are quarantined, but not the general population.
Link: https://pressroom.usc.edu/preliminary-results-of-usc-la-county-covid-19-study-released/