...much more good is done by electing Trump than by electing Biden.
It is a pure utilitarian calculus: Quantify the the good and bad for electing each, and then vote with the one that maximizes utility for the nation.
So, for example, if Candidate A has one sexual assault and Candidate B has 17 sexual assaults, Candidate A wins...if we stop there.
But I place "murder avoidance" at a much higher level than "sexual assault avoidance." (I assume you do to, but your posts here do seem to undermine my assumption.)
So, for further example, if Candidate A supports policies that kill hundreds of thousands of children, but Candidate B supports policies that would help those children survive, I would vote for Candidate B, as the 17 sexual assaults pale in comparison to the net good of potentially saving many more lives over the long haul.
Add in saving jobs...and setting policy that will avoid war on the one hand, and win wars if they come on the other...etc., etc., etc.
And, I don't think utilitarian logic lends itself to designating anyone a "Messiah," so your false projections on me are irrelevant, even if they help you demonize your opponent by falsely believing your opponent is a mindless cult member. If the math changes, I will change, which is the opposite of cult behavior. I might vote for Biden, but you would never vote for Trump. Which is more cult-like?