That was obviously well before the me too era and at the time most people assumed Clinton had a history of infidelity, but didn't believe the rape claims. Juanita Brodderick is credible in 2020, but wasn't viewed that way in 1992 or 1996 (especially since she said under oath it didn't happen). At the time most Clinton voters (and I'll even say most Dole voter) viewed Bill as guilty of infidelity, but not guilty of rape/assault.
But, Bill's history with women was the main reason I though HRC was such a bad candidate in 2016. She was the only Dem that couldn't exploit Trump's biggest weakness since she herself had a history of discrediting Bill's accusers.
The difference with Trump is most of his voters absolutely know the claims against him are true and voted for him anyway. I think that is the first time that has happened.