You talk about "whataboutism," but that is exactly my point. I use whataboutism not as a defense of Trump's actions, but to point to the hypocrisy of his attackers, which is exactly what I said above, to which you then said "bullshit" and then proceeded to point out that I was accurate. Very strange, Frank. You work very hard to misunderstand things just so you can make it look like you are winning an argument...when in fact we are agreeing. Talk about a "shuffle." You have it down pat.
Now, as to his policies, which the body of your post discusses: We just disagree on that...which is also what I said above. Of course I like his policies. They are, for the most part, good for the United States, so of course I defend those. Seriously, reread my post.
Here is an example: You said, "You have never once criticized him on anything of substance that I can recall other than on what he says, which you dismiss as irrelevant." That is right in line with what I said above, and yet you then said, "Bullshit" and then you proceed to say essentially what I said about the substance/policies (albeit a little more emphatically).
You project so much of your derangement into my posts. You would do much better if you just read the words, and take them at face value. The "shuffle" accusations are usually raised by you when you have misunderstood fundamental points I've made, because you have an emotional need to put me in the cultist/toady category, when intellectually, you really know that I am not. Whatever.