There are legitimate reasons to disagree with what I wrote, but a strawman like your post is not helpful. You know one thing for certain: you disagree with me...but sometimes in your scramble to disagree, you come up with nothing but crap.
I said that in the United States, our traditions and culture put us at or near the sweet spot for beneficial democracy. There is no need to increase turnout as we are already at maximal beneficial democracy.
Our Founding Fathers knew that too much democracy can be a bad thing, which is why the Constitution provides for a Democratic Constitutional Republic, not a Democracy. I suppose you think they hate democracy, too, but that is inaccurate.
My argument just builds on this principle that some is good but too much can be bad. Surely you see the point, even if you disagree with it.