Most of the commutations Obama gave were for non-violent drug offenders. Not people he knew personally. You would think a libertarian would support those commutations.
Stone was not victim of a corrupt system. He is a criminal that happens to be a friend and supporter of the president, and someone that wouldn't rat him out. You think that Stone would have had his sentence commuted if he didn't know Trump personally or if he gave the prosecution some dirt on Trump in exchange for a lesser sentence?
Short answer is should pardons be used to correct an injustice? Yes. Should pardons be used for personal and/or political gain (as was the case with Stone)? No. If it is used that way, then it is a perfect example of the imbalanced law and order you are referring to.
Also, back to the McCloskey's, I never said they should have anything happen to them outside of the law. If it is found they broke the law, then they should be convicted. If they didn't, they shouldn't be. That said, many conservative posters here referred to their courage and described them as heroes. That is the hypocrisy I was referring to. Not the legal ramifications.