as I mentioned to Ned below, I'm not sure that everyone is on-board with the radical changes 'going nuclear' represents...for instance, 'husbanding' petroleum resources for the unique and critical uses brought out in Ned's video, while finding ways of replacing fossil fuel usage in many other areas. Again, with a (world) economy so dependent on those fuels, literally everyone is affected, some much more than others, so commitment to that change and careful planning are essential.
For 'point of emphasis' I repeat the public statement from British Petroleum in 2014 that they believed we had ~53 years of oil reserves, at expected consumption rates.
Your thoughts and comments, Baron...