You are really good at this "never agreeing with people even though you actually agree with them" thing.
Step by step explanation for you:
1) I said "not law, just an opinion" meaning a personal opinion and not binding.
2) You apparently read "not law, just binding law." Your reading of my post requires a contradiction, and therefore makes no sense. That would not be a preferred reading of any court case, must less an internet post. But you wanted to disagree with me, so you didn't worry about any other more reasonable interpretations that most people read.
3) I nonetheless clarified my meaning while you were posting, thinking someone like you might misinterpret "opinion" as "binding law." And, now, you actually agree with the content of my post, but that is totally unacceptable to you...you must maintain a constant level of criticism, so....
4) Now you criticize me for clarifying my post.
Again, well done. Mentally deranged, but very good mental derangement.