Your original post was that the case wasn’t law because it was an opinion, blatantly wrong. You then took 5 shots at trying to explain it was dicta which wasn’t your original thought at all.
This message has been edited 1 time(s).
Your original post was that the case wasn’t law because it was an opinion, blatantly wrong. You then took 5 shots at trying to explain it was dicta which wasn’t your original thought at all.