It's no surprise that the SoS would disagree and try to discredit the audit. Unfortunately, she fails in her attempt. It's not really a credible argument to suggest you need to be an expert specifically in election systems to perform an effective system audit.
There are obvious questions that she conveniently doesn't address. Such as the deleted log files (a BIG problem) or the 68% error rate. If they have nothing to hide, then let's get this in court and bring in opposing experts. I've noticed that not a single person refuting the questions around irregularities has offered to make a sworn statement backing up their assertions.
And we can already conclude with reasonable confidence that the SoS outright lied about the "human error" they previously claimed. Her credibility is questionable.
I'm perfectly willing to see hard evidence from an opposing IT expert refuting the claims in the audit. Statements from the SoS don't cut it though.