A few thoughts. Did you read the entire article? I didn't intend for the SOS to be the sole explanation. It was an to pique your interest.
1. Michigan Elections Director Jonathan Brater said in a weekend court filing the report "makes a series of unsupported conclusions, ascribes motives of fraud and obfuscation to processes that are easily explained as routine election procedures or error corrections, and suggests without explanation that elements of election software not used in Michigan are somehow responsible for tabulation or reporting errors that are either nonexistent or easily explained." Let's see where this goes. Is it one more nefarious claim?
2. "this is caused by intentional errors in the system," the report says. This suggests a major conspiracy to overturn the election. Has yet to be proven in any fashion.