"'By 1963, public and private two year headcount enrollment stood at 850,361. By 1980, enrollment had grown to 4,526,287... approximately a 230 percent increase in student attendance'"
Do you agree that going from 850,361 all the way to 4,526,287 is approximately a 230 percent increase? If you don't, then you must agree that her math skills are full of garbage, and that nobody on her sham of a committee bothered to do their jobs of checking her assertions.
"After Roosevelt’s death, Truman, as the next president, created the Truman Commission."
Do you agree that Harry Truman created the Truman Commission *after* Roosevelt's death? If you agree with what the history books tell you (he was a US Senator when the commission had been created, and that Roosevelt was very much alive at the time) then you must also agree that Jill Biden is a liar and absolutely full of shit with her statement. There is no in-between here. She has had many opportunities to make corrections to her dissertation and *still* hasn't done so.
Do you agree that her dissertation has enough actual material in it, and not just a LOT of text copies of various transcripts tossed into appendices that comprise a rather sizable portion of this poorly-written dissertation?
Just because the PhD holder is a popular political figure among the left, should not exempt that person from being scrutinized for correctness of content. If anything, political figures shouldn't be averse to being held to higher levels of scrutiny.
I said the exact same thing about the liberals' hero Hwang Woo Suk back in the days of his being the alleged "godfather of embryonic stem cell research," that his methodologies in his "Science" paper were severely flawed, that he should face much further scrutiny, and I was entirely right. His fanatical followers would pathetically defend him, claiming "well, *most* of his work on embryonic stem cells is correct..." Well, the fact that he never was able to mass produce them in the way he claimed to be able to do so pretty much killed off his credibility.